The Hanover Institute for Public Policy
MethodologyAbout

Search

4 results for “First-Party Study”

DiscourseJune 26, 2026

We Measured the Same Antisemitic Conspiracy in Search and in the Feed Where It Lives. What Does Each One Say?

A study of the conspiracy-of-power trope in two places: the top of search debunks it, while the conspiracy community where it lives affirms it about six times as often.

DiscourseJune 26, 2026

We Read the 36 Most-Watched Israel-Gaza Explainers. How Do They Frame the Conflict?

A first-party study of the language in the 36 most-watched Israel-Gaza explainer videos: contested-claim verdicts, who is named the actor, and the words used for each side.

Trend AnalysisJune 26, 2026

Which Antisemitic Narratives Are Gaining Search Attention?

A first reading of the Institute’s search-attention tally: searches for the great replacement rose about 240% year over year, anti-Zionism about 209%.

DiscourseJune 25, 2026

How Gaza-War Headlines Name the Agent of Violence

A corpus study of 1,976 Gaza-war headlines: only 19% depict a violent act, and when one names an actor it is Israel 80% of the time and no one 23%.

The Hanover Institute for Public Policy

The Hanover Institute for Public Policy is a nonpartisan, nonadvocacy research organization that informs the public about the inputs fueling antisemitism in the United States. It does not take policy positions. The Institute conducts content analysis, computational social science research, and other data-driven research.

Subscribe to our newsletter
Research
  • Research
  • Methodology
Institute
  • About
  • Mission & Standards
  • Funding
  • Contact
Topics
  • Online & Social Media
  • Narratives & Tropes
  • Media & Representation
  • Israel & Anti-Zionism
  • AI & Technology
  • Incidents & Trends
  • Drivers & Effects
Formats
  • Data Report
  • Explainer
  • Narrative Analysis
  • Method
  • Trend Analysis
  • Comparison
  • Discourse
© 2026 The Hanover Institute for Public Policy
Terms of UsePrivacy Policy